Tracking what every party says — 2026 General Election & beyond
← All promises
TOPPledged

Healthy Oceans

Environment7 tracked updates
+1
✦ AI Overview

Pitched as a "generational investment" to bring back abundant, living oceans, TOP's Healthy Oceans policy promises to put biodiversity at the centre of how Aotearoa manages its seas — overhauling fisheries, sharply expanding marine protection, and building a "blue economy" while honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

The Policy: TOP Healthy Oceans Policy — 2026 Election →

What it does:

  • Sets a headline target of 30% of New Zealand's ocean territory protected as marine reserve by 2035, up from roughly 0.5% in full no-take protection today — a vast jump that would put New Zealand in line with the global "30x30" biodiversity goal.
  • Proposes to phase out bottom trawling, the dragging of weighted nets across the seafloor, which TOP frames as the single most destructive fishing method in New Zealand waters.
  • Overhauls fisheries management by shifting from single-species quotas toward ecosystem-based management and lifting the sustainability baseline for fish stocks from 40% to 50% of estimated unfished (virgin) biomass — a higher bar intended to rebuild depleted stocks for commercial, recreational and customary fishers alike.
  • Mandates cameras on all commercial fishing boats for full catch transparency, reinstates a cross-government Oceans Secretariat, funds open-access marine research, and opposes seabed mining.
  • Honours the 1992 Māori Fisheries Settlement and positions iwi and hapū as full partners in marine protection planning, protecting customary fishing rights.
  • Estimates the cost to government at no more than $100 million a year, with TOP arguing much of it is cost-neutral or positive to the Crown over time, partly recoverable from the commercial industry, and citing potential for around $500 million a year in additional blue-economy revenue.

The result:

The policy lands squarely in a live national fight rather than a hypothetical one. TOP is an unrepresented minor party, so this is an aspirational platform, not a programme it can pass — its real-world weight is as a marker of how far the protection end of the spectrum has moved. It sits in deliberate opposition to the National-NZ First-ACT government's direction: in June 2025 Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones confirmed the Government would not progress closures of the Hauraki Gulf to bottom trawling this term, and a Fisheries Amendment Bill that critics say restricts release of on-boat camera footage advanced through Parliament. Jones argues bottom trawling covers just 1.7% of New Zealand's combined territorial sea and EEZ while delivering roughly 70% of commercial catch and underpinning a $1.57 billion export industry. Critics including Green oceans spokesperson Teanau Tuiono, Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick and Greenpeace's Ellie Hooper counter that the 1.7% figure is the most generous possible framing, because it measures trawling against the entire four-million-square-kilometre EEZ — most of it deep abyssal water no trawler would ever work — rather than against the fishable continental shelf where the damage actually concentrates. Public opinion has swung toward the protection camp: a June 2026 WWF-NZ/Horizon Research poll found 90% support limits on bottom trawling and 81% want expanded marine protected areas. Whether TOP's specific prescriptions "deliver" is contested: industry body Seafood NZ argues New Zealand's Quota Management System is already a world-leading sustainability model, while conservation scientists say recovery has stalled and reserves remain tiny.

The impacts to watch:

  • Industry disruption and cost. Phasing out bottom trawling and lifting the biomass baseline would hit the deepwater fleet hardest — about 60% of quota sits with three companies — raising questions about jobs, the ~9,000 direct fisheries workers, and how transition costs are shared between the Crown and industry.
  • Treaty and customary rights. Any reshaping of marine space intersects with the 1992 Settlement and iwi/hapū rights; the policy's promise of partnership will be judged on whether protection is co-designed rather than imposed.
  • The credibility gap on enforcement. A 30%-by-2035 reserve target and 100% camera coverage are only as good as monitoring and funding; sceptics will watch whether a $100m/year envelope is realistic against the scale promised.
  • Spillover and recovery evidence. TOP leans on the "spillover" argument that protected zones reseed surrounding fisheries; results will turn on whether new reserves are placed and policed well enough to show measurable rebound.

Neutrality note: This summary states the positions of the party, the Government and named critics as attributed claims, not endorsements; figures such as the 1.7% trawling footprint are accurate but their interpretation is genuinely contested.

This overview is summarised by AI from public sources. It may contain errors and is a guide, not the definitive record — we welcome corrections.

❓ Our Questions — you decide

Where our research raises a question the policy doesn't answer, we put it to you — these are our questions, not government policy. Your vote stays anonymous even when you sign up (we use sign-up only to send you more things to vote on that you care about), and we report aggregated results only — the country's sentiment, never how any individual voted.

Should New Zealand aim to protect 30% of its ocean as marine reserve by 2035, even if it means big changes for the commercial fishing industry?
0
Should bottom trawling be phased out in New Zealand waters, even though it currently provides most of the commercial fishing catch?
0
Should New Zealand ban bottom trawling entirely to protect ocean biodiversity?
0
Should 30% of New Zealand's ocean territory be fully protected as marine reserves by 2035?
0
Should footage from cameras on commercial fishing boats be publicly accessible under the Official Information Act?
0

Key milestones

Nov 2025official
TOP rebrands as Opportunity, Healthy Oceans policy unveiled

Following the 2023 election, The Opportunities Party (TOP) overhauled its leadership and brand. In November 2025 Qiulae Wong — a 37-year-old Auckland sustainable business consultant — was elected leader, and the party rebranded as simply "Opportunity." The Healthy Oceans policy emerged as a centrepiece of the 2026 campaign: a pledge to protect 30% of New Zealand's ocean territory as marine reserve by 2035, phase out bottom trawling, mandate cameras on all commercial fishing vessels, and shift fisheries management from single-species quotas to ecosystem-based management. Wong framed it as "a generational investment that puts biodiversity at the heart of marine policy."

1News
Feb 2026official
Wong's State of the Nation: "ripping up our seabeds is not in New Zealanders' interests"

On 21 February 2026, Opportunity leader Qiulae Wong delivered her first State of the Nation address, with representatives from WWF, Greenpeace, and Forest & Bird in attendance. Wong formally launched the Healthy Oceans policy, describing bottom trawling as "ripping up our seabeds to sell a few more boxes of fish fingers" and pledging to ban the practice. The policy costed annual government expenditure at no more than $100 million, with potential for $500 million per year in additional blue-economy revenue from sustainable aquaculture, marine tourism and biotechnology. Wong also committed to honouring the 1992 Māori Fisheries Settlement and to iwi and hapū as full partners in marine protection planning.

The Opportunity Party
Mar 2026news
Government shelves Hauraki Gulf trawling closures; Jones calls critics "noisy voices"

In contrast to Opportunity's direction, the National-NZ First-ACT coalition moved in the opposite direction. In May 2025, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones shelved plans to close parts of the Hauraki Gulf to bottom trawling, confirming the Government would not progress trawl corridor proposals this term. In March 2026 Jones introduced the Fisheries Amendment Bill, which passed its first reading with coalition support. Critics including Ellie Hooper (Greenpeace Aotearoa oceans lead) branded it the "ocean exploitation bill" — pointing to provisions blocking Official Information Act access to on-boat camera footage, imposing $50,000 fines for leaking footage, and extending catch-limit review cycles from one year to five. Jones called opponents "a range of noisy voices" and cited the Hauraki Gulf Marine Protection Act — which created new high-protection areas but allowed ring-netting in two of them — as evidence of the Government's commitment to ocean health.

Greenpeace Aotearoa
May 2026news
1.7% vs the whole sea floor: the framing battle over bottom trawling's footprint

In May 2026 Minister Jones claimed bottom trawling affected only 1.7% of New Zealand's territorial sea and EEZ in 2024/25, describing the practice as "extremely limited." Critics immediately contested the framing. Green Party oceans spokesperson Teanau Tuiono and co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick noted that measuring trawling against the full four-million-square-kilometre EEZ — most of it deep abyssal water no trawler would work — flatters the statistic considerably; measured against the fishable continental shelf where impacts concentrate, the footprint is far higher. Greenpeace's Ellie Hooper also pointed out the Fisheries Amendment Bill simultaneously attempted to make camera footage of those operations legally inaccessible. Industry body Seafood NZ defended the quota management system as a world-leading sustainability model. The exchange crystallised the core divide Opportunity's Healthy Oceans policy aims to fill: who counts the sea floor, and who gets to show what happens on it.

Newswire NZ
Jun 2026news
Status now: an aspirational pre-election platform with no parliamentary seat to deliver it

As of June 2026, Healthy Oceans remains a campaign pledge from a party that currently holds no parliamentary seats after failing to clear the 5% threshold in 2023. The policy's value is partly as a reference point — shifting where the protection end of the political spectrum sits — and partly as a vote-targeting strategy in a cycle where 71% of voters say oceans policy influences their vote. Meanwhile the Fisheries Amendment Bill is before select committee; its cameras-on-boats provisions are opposed by the Chief Ombudsman, who described OIA exemption as "unnecessary and excessive." Whether Opportunity enters parliament and can negotiate any of this into a coalition agreement remains entirely open. Coverage in 1News and NZ Herald in mid-2026 focused on the challenge of the 5% hurdle rather than policy details.

1News
Jun 2026news
Poll: 90% of New Zealanders want bottom trawling limits; ocean issues rising up the ballot

A June 2026 Horizon Research poll commissioned by WWF-New Zealand (1,032 nationally representative adults, ±3% margin of error) found 90% of New Zealanders support restricting bottom trawling in some form — with 55% favouring a complete ban in the Hauraki Gulf. Support for expanded marine protected areas stood at 81%. Critically for the election, 71% said ocean-protection policies influence their voting decisions, and 34% said they would change their vote based on ocean commitments — up from 27% in 2024. WWF-NZ spokesperson Caitlin Owers described the findings as evidence that "ocean issues could feature more significantly this election." A separate Scoop report noted the share of voters citing bottom trawling as the top marine threat rose from 37% in 2024 to 47% in 2026. The data landscape gives credibility to Opportunity's Healthy Oceans pitch, even if the party must clear the 5% parliamentary threshold to act on it.

RNZ News
Jun 2026
What people are saying

Public sentiment leans strongly toward ocean protection: calls to ban bottom trawling and expand marine reserves dominate, while commercial fishing voices defend the Quota Management System and argue trawling restrictions risk thousands of jobs. See the conversation:

Aggregated — individual posts are not cited.

Sources

Do you still agree with this promise? In the live site, your vote here feeds your weekly email digest and the party scorecards on the home page.