Tracking what every party says — 2026 General Election & beyond
← All promises
NZ FirstPledged

Oppose co-governance and UNDRIP

Treaty & Governance6 tracked updates
0
✦ AI Overview

Pitched as a defence of "one person, one vote" democracy and equal citizenship for all New Zealanders, NZ First's position opposes co-governance, the use of undefined "principles of the Treaty of Waitangi" in legislation, and any binding domestic effect for the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).

The Policy: NZ First Democracy and Sovereignty Policy — 2023 Election →

NZ First leader Winston Peters argues that co-governance arrangements give appointed Māori representatives decision-making power outside ordinary democratic accountability, and that the "partnership" reading of the Treaty has been over-extended by the courts since the 1987 Lands case. Critics — including the Waitangi Tribunal, Te Pāti Māori, and a number of legal academics — counter that the position misreads Te Tiriti, weakens Crown obligations to Māori, and was advanced without adequate engagement with iwi and hapū. This entry describes NZ First's stated position and the contest around it; it does not endorse any characterisation of Māori, iwi, or co-governance.

What it does:

  • Commits to a government review of all legislation (excluding Treaty settlements) that references "the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi", to replace those references with specific wording or repeal them — a coalition commitment NZ First secured in the November 2023 National–NZ First agreement.
  • Targets a specific drafting device: dozens of statutes refer to Treaty "principles" without defining them, leaving the meaning to be developed by the courts and the Waitangi Tribunal. The Ministry of Justice review began covering 28 Acts across 13 agencies and was narrowed to a final 19 Acts across 11 agencies.
  • Confirms in the coalition agreement that UNDRIP "has no binding legal effect" in New Zealand, and that the government will stop all work on He Puapua — the 2019 officials' report (working group chaired by law professor Claire Charters) that sketched a roadmap toward realising UNDRIP by 2040.
  • Sits alongside, but is distinct from, ACT's Treaty Principles Bill: NZ First agreed only to support that bill to select committee, and Peters and NZ First's Shane Jones said publicly the party would not back it any further.
  • Also folds in NZ First's opposition to specific co-governance proposals, such as the previous government's Three Waters water-services model, which Peters argued would have given mana whenua appointees disproportionate influence over board decisions.

The result:

The legislative pieces have moved unevenly. ACT's Treaty Principles Bill passed its first reading 68–54 on 14 November 2024 but was defeated 112–11 at second reading on 10 April 2025, with only ACT supporting it — an outcome NZ First's stance (support to committee only) helped guarantee. The separate review NZ First championed has advanced: by early 2026 Cabinet had taken policy decisions and the Justice Minister, Paul Goldsmith, had issued drafting instructions, though no amending bill had yet been introduced. Supporters frame this as removing vague law and restoring legal equality; critics, including the Waitangi Tribunal and legal academic Carwyn Jones, argue it weakens enforceable Crown duties (for example replacing "give effect to" with "take into account") and that Treaty jurisprudence is already settled after decades of case law. Officials at the Ministry of Justice reportedly warned the proposals carried "significant risk" and limited apparent benefit, and flagged likely litigation and Waitangi Tribunal claims. NZ First and the government reject the suggestion that clarifying or removing undefined principles diminishes settled Treaty rights.

The impacts to watch:

  • Whether the eventual amending legislation survives legal challenge, given officials' warnings of litigation risk and a critical Waitangi Tribunal report.
  • The breadth of public reaction: the Treaty Principles Bill drew an estimated 300,000-plus submissions and a national Hīkoi mō te Tiriti of about 42,000 people at Parliament in November 2024, signalling how contested any wider Treaty-clause changes are likely to be.

This overview is summarised by AI from public sources. It may contain errors and is a guide, not the definitive record — we welcome corrections.

❓ Our Questions — you decide

Where our research raises a question the policy doesn't answer, we put it to you — these are our questions, not government policy. Your vote stays anonymous even when you sign up (we use sign-up only to send you more things to vote on that you care about), and we report aggregated results only — the country's sentiment, never how any individual voted.

Many laws mention "the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi" without defining them. Should Parliament spell out clearly in law what those principles mean?
0
Officials warned that changing the Treaty wording could weaken the government's enforceable duties to Māori. Would you keep the current wording rather than risk that?
0
Should references to "the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi" in legislation be replaced with specific, defined wording?
0
Should New Zealand give the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) binding effect in domestic law?
0
Should major changes to how the Treaty is referenced in law require a public referendum?
0

Key milestones

Nov 2023official
Coalition deal locks in NZ First's Treaty conditions

As part of the National–NZ First coalition agreement, the new government commits to reviewing legislation that references the undefined "principles of the Treaty of Waitangi", to stop work on the He Puapua report, and to confirm that UNDRIP has no binding legal effect in New Zealand. NZ First framed these as restoring democratic equality; the deal was signed on 24 November 2023.

Coalition details at a glance — RNZ
Nov 2024news
NZ First backs ACT's Treaty bill only to committee

ACT's separate Treaty Principles Bill — which NZ First agreed to support only as far as select committee — passed its first reading 68–54 on 14 November 2024. Peters and NZ First's Shane Jones said publicly the party would not support the bill beyond that point, distinguishing NZ First's own position from ACT's attempt to define the principles by referendum.

Treaty Principles Bill — Wikipedia
Apr 2025news
ACT's bill defeated; NZ First's own review continues

The Treaty Principles Bill was voted down 112–11 at its second reading on 10 April 2025, with only ACT in support — an outcome NZ First's "committee only" stance helped ensure. The distinct review NZ First secured, into Treaty-principles references across the statute book, remained on foot and separate from the failed bill.

Treaty Principles Bill — Wikipedia
Feb 2026official
Cabinet decides; drafting instructions issued

The Ministry of Justice review of Treaty-principles references — championed by NZ First — reached the decision stage. Cabinet made policy decisions in February 2026 and Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith issued drafting instructions. The scope had narrowed from an initial 28 Acts (13 agencies) to a final 19 Acts across 11 agencies. No amending bill had yet been introduced.

Review of legislation referencing Treaty principles — Ministry of Justice
Apr 2026news
Officials warn of risk as clauses set to be weakened

Reporting indicated some Treaty clauses would be amended (for example, "give effect to" replaced with the weaker "take into account") or repealed. The Spinoff reported Ministry of Justice officials had warned the proposals carried "significant risk" with limited apparent benefit, citing likely litigation, Waitangi Tribunal claims and strain on Māori–Crown relations. Legal academic Carwyn Jones said Treaty law was already well-settled after decades of case law; the government rejected the suggestion that clarifying undefined principles erodes settled rights.

Treaty clauses to be weakened, repealed — The Spinoff
2024–2026
How the conversation has run online

Online debate is sharply polarised: supporters frame removing undefined Treaty "principles" and rejecting UNDRIP as restoring equal citizenship and democratic accountability, while opponents call it an attack on Te Tiriti and Māori rights, pointing to the 2024 Hīkoi mō te Tiriti as evidence of broad opposition.

See the conversation:

Aggregated — individual posts are not cited.

Sources

Do you still agree with this promise? In the live site, your vote here feeds your weekly email digest and the party scorecards on the home page.